nanonet
| JNNB Top | Subscribe Now! | INTERVIEW | TEXT | Past Issues |
JNNB Search
======================================================================
                        JAPAN NANONET BULLETIN
               -- 32nd Issue --       November 25, 2004
Nanotechnology Researchers Network Center of Japan
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
======================================================================


IN THIS ISSUE

  Nanonet Special Interview (Part I):
  Dr. Mihail C. ROCO
  Senior Adviser for Nanotechnology, National Science Foundation (NSF)
  Chair for U.S. Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology (NSET), 
  National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) 

-- NANO CALENDAR -- 
  For information on nanotechnology related symposiums and conferences 
held in the world,
  http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/calendar/


----------------------------------------------------------------------

NANONET SPECIAL INTERVIEW (PART I)

Visions for the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (Part I)
(Issued in Japanese: November 24, 2004)

  Dr. Mihail C. ROCO
  Senior Adviser for Nanotechnology, National Science Foundation (NSF)
  Chair for U.S. Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology (NSET),
  National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)

We had an opportunity to interview him about his visions for the U.S. 
National Nanotechnology Initiative during his visit to the National 
Institute for Materials Science at Tsukuba, Japan in February 2003. 
This interview article was revised in October 2004.

This is the part I of this interview. The part II contains the 
objective of NBIC Convergence project, societal implications and 
international collaboration on nanotechnology. The part II will be 
issued on December 9, 2004.


Q: Your major was Mechanical Engineering. It seems that nanotechnology 
and Mechanical engineering are not related to each other. What made 
you work on nanotechnology?

Dr. Roco: Your question can be regarded as what are nanoscale science 
and engineering. Basically all disciplines have a contribution. My 
research work was a combination of chemical, mechanics and computer 
simulation areas in the early 80's. I noted in my work on finely 
dispersed multiphase systems that shared layers behaved like a 
superfluid or a quasi-solid depending on the thickness of those layers 
in a confined space. In a subsequent IBM-sponsored project on two-
phase toner flow, I observed how nanometer-size particles and thin 
layers unexpectedly and significantly change properties if their 
dimensions or shapes become closer to the atomic or molecular size.  
Interacting with numerous researchers and consulting with a wide 
variety of industries helped me to understand the multiple facets of 
nanoscience. I became interested in the overall picture of its 
potential implications on knowledge development and transforming tools 
at the end of 80's. In 1990, I proposed the nanoparticle program at 
NSF, and since then I have devoted more time to the advancement of the 
entire field of nanotechnology besides my research and teaching.

Q: So do you think that there are no differences between fields where 
nanotechnology is concerned?

Dr. Roco: Nanotechnology deals with the intermediate domain between a 
single atom or a single molecule and large molecular systems, where 
all primary structures and properties of matter are defined, at the 
transitions between discontinued behavior and continuum behavior. Here, 
all fields of science and engineering deal directly with atoms and 
molecules, without using the discipline-specific averaging methods and 
mathematical formalisms that are applicable at the micro and macro 
scales. The phenomena are strongly correlated and simultaneous at the 
nanoscale and cannot be treated in the frame of a single discipline 
any longer. So, you will reach the same conclusions no matter what 
discipline you start with your exploration. One has to analyze the 
interdependent phenomena at the same time. This is the reason why many 
researchers in different disciplines like to work together in 
nanoscience, and why they integrate disciplines and use a transforming 
system approach in nanoengineering. 

Q: You have actually started worldwide nanotechnology initiatives and 
are working in the midst of everything. Each government has its own 
policies and initiatives. How do you feel about this trend? What are 
your impressions?

Dr. Roco: First of all, it's an interesting trend that more than 30 
countries have developed activities or plans at the national level in 
the field of nanotechnology within two years after NNI was announced 
in January 2000. The spread of national programs in nanotechnology is 
much faster than in information technology in the 70's and 80's or 
biotechnology in the 80's and 90's. The long-term vision of 
nanotechnology has focused on the systematic control of matter at the 
nanoscale that would affect almost all sectors of society is a key 
factor in these rapid changes. Main outcomes are added-value synergies 
among various scientific and technological branches, acceleration of 
research and education in critical areas of progress, and converging 
technologies from the nanoscale for increasing human potential. In the 
United States, we have a focus on "horizontal" interdisciplinary 
strategy for applying not only the tools and methods but also the 
architecture and the principles of many different fields to a new one. 
In Korea, in another example, the focus has been more on a "vertical" 
development strategy for turning fundamental discoveries into useful 
products in one field at a time. This strategy fits better in smaller 
countries. They are working to become the best in the area of high 
density memory. In Australia, they have started to focus on 
nanostructure photonics and a little on nanobiology while Japan has 
focused on promoting both "horizontal" interdisciplinary 
infrastructures and targeted potential industrial applications. In the 
United States, about 75% of the overall R&D (research and development) 
investment has come from industry and 25% comes from the government, 
and of this last one only half has been used for developing civilian 
applications. This is the reasons that the Federal government has 
focused on creating the long-term foundation for developments to be 
made by industry. Currently developments in nanoscale fundamental 
research are occurring faster than expected, and many governmental 
agencies around the world have started their own initiatives to 
support fundamental long-term research. 

Q: What do you think the overall vision should be? 

Dr. Roco: It took us about 3 years from 1997 to 2000 to begin a global 
nanotechnology initiative. We prepared this program looking ten years 
ahead, and we conducted international benchmarking and considered what 
governments can or cannot do to foster open interaction with the 
public and to address societal implications. We spent months looking 
for funding agencies to invest in our program, but at the beginning 
nobody paid attention probably because of the difficulties in dealing 
with nanoscale materials. In 2000, with the President Clinton's 
support for the NNI programs, it became a national interest. We 
emphasized that, beyond the small size, new phenomena at the nanoscale 
are more important. In addition, because of weak molecular 
interactions, smaller energy requirements and the need for less 
material, manufacturing can be accomplished with the highest return 
and added value. A unified science and engineering platform based on 
the same principles and transforming tools at the nanoscale will 
emerge. NNI reached about $1 billion in R&D investment in 2004, which 
is about four times higher than in 2000, while the worldwide R&D 
investments will exceed $3.6 billion in 2004. In summary, the long-
term vision and addressing societal implications are key drivers for 
the advancement of nanotechnology. Its importance has been proven by 
the 30 countries that started using the basic concepts of NNI in a 
short period of time. 
 (To be continued ...)
(Interviewer: Kazuyo Yamashiro, Nanonet)

For more information, 
http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/2004/032a.html


--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--

Nanotechnology Researchers Network Center of Japan distributes
this e-mail newsletter, "JAPAN NANONET BULLETIN", every other Thursday
with the aim of promoting information exchange and cooperation among
researchers in nanotechnology and related fields.

The next issue of JAPAN NANONET BULLETIN will be delivered on 
December 9, 2004.

JAPAN NANONET BULLETIN contains articles, "Nanonet Interview", in 
which we interview a leading researcher about current issues and/or
research strategies for the future and "Young Researchers' 
Introduction", in which a young researcher in the nanotechnology field
introduces his/her own recent research.

We appreciate your support very much and promise to continue to gather
and disseminate information for your benefit.

Read details on our privacy policy at:
http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/policy.html

Subscribe at:
http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/index.html

Change or cancel your subscription at:
http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/upd_del.html

Inquiry about the newsletter: emag@nanonet.go.jp
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nanotechnology Researchers Network Center of Japan
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
Our website: http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/
Inquiry: info@nanonet.go.jp

Copyright(c) 2003-2004, Nanotechnology Researchers Network Center of 
Japan,
All rights reserved.